Tag: jenna ortega

Categories
Reviews

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024) – Review

(The Reveal, 2024)

Beetlejuice first graced our screens in 1988 establishing a whacky and absurd world which introduced many of us to director Tim Burton’s unique visuals and infamous filmmaking style. Now, 36 years later, a sequel to this timeless, cult classic promises to recapture the magic of the original and reimagine it in the modern world. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice centres on a now grown up Lydia Deetz (Winona Ryder) as she navigates both her supernatural abilities and her role as a mother.

We meet Lydia’s daughter Astrid Deetz (Jenna Ortega) and learn of their strained relationship whilst appearances from Beetlejuice alumni Delia Deetz (Catherine O’Hara) and the demon himself – Beetlejuice (Michael Keaton) are also welcomed. Much like the original, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice blends the humorous with the horrific and takes us on a journey filled with nostalgia and theatrics aiming to raise the stakes in an action packed sequel.

As Beetlejuice Beetlejuice opens we are reintroduced to Lydia Deetz. Once a moody, misunderstood teenager Lydia now uses her talents to contact supernatural beings who inhabit or haunt the homes of unsuspecting home-goers. A death in the family (Lydia’s father Charles) brings Lydia back to her estranged daughter Astrid. With the two reunited we learn that their complicated relationship stems from the death of Astrid’s father, and Lydia’s refusal to talk about it. This caused a rift which was further splintered when Lydia pursued ‘Ghost House’, a television show which publicises her abilities; Astrid does not believe in ghosts and thinks the show capitalises on people’s vulnerability.

One obvious observation of this relationship is that it is reminiscent of the relationship Lydia had with her parents – specifically her stepmother Delia – in Beetlejuice. Both of these family dynamics are caused by the separation from a loved one and it is Lydia’s endeavour to save Astrid from the Netherworld that makes her realise that she has ‘spent too much time talking to the dead [and] it’s time [she] started living’. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice explores the relationship between life and death using Astrid and Lydia to portray the importance of processing grief and the consequences it can have on families if left to fester.

(Blavity, 2024)

Since its groundbreaking release in the 80’s, Beetlejuice has been a constant source of inspiration for all mediums of art. Notably a musical adaptation of the horror comedy in 2019 took the Broadway stage by storm, retelling Burton’s bizarre story through the use of upbeat songs and flashy dance numbers.

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice has taken a cue from the world of theatre and uses music and dance to elevate the storytelling in this sequel. It is always risky introducing musical theatre into an existing franchise – but Beetlejuice is no stranger to a song and dance. Arguably the most famous scene from the original movie is the dinner party dance scene where Charles and Delia Deetz and their guests are possessed and forced to perform to Harry Belafonte’s Day-O (Banana Boat Song). Considering the popularity of this particular sequence as well as the love for the musical adaptation, it was no surprise that Beetlejuice Beetlejuice leaned into its musical potential.

Perhaps the most captivating musical number from this movie occurs when Beetlejuice crashes Lydia’s wedding, and demands she marry him after he aided her in rescuing Astrid from the Netherworld. Set to Richard Harris’ ‘MacArthur Park’ the church becomes a stage on which a strange yet mesmerising song and dance sequence ensues. Both the characters on the screen and the viewers in the audience are possessed by Beetlejuice and encouraged to surrender themselves to Burton’s whimsical and nonsensical cinematic world.

The music also gives the Netherworld a 70s makeover making use of The Bee Gees’ ‘Tragedy’ when we are first introduced to Beetlejuice’s ex-wife and immortal enemy Delores (Monica Belluci), and showcases the ‘Soul Train’ which takes the deceased – dressed in 70s attire and disco dancing – to the great beyond. This decision maximises nostalgia as fans of the original likely grew up during this decade.

(Deadline, 2024)

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice lives up to the reputation of the original by perfectly blending heartfelt, family sentiment with ludicrous and at times unhinged comedy. It gives us an opportunity to revisit characters we loved from Beetlejuice and presents us with new characters who allow us to venture deeper into the ever-expanding cinematic universe that Tim Burton has created. Furthermore the sequel manages to uphold the visual and atmospheric aesthetic first established in Beetlejuice but presents it in a modern society; one we are all familiar with. Overall Beetlejuice Beetlejuice embraces the strange and unusual by combining nostalgia with the contemporary role of the outcast, and using music to encourage people to unleash their authentic selves.

Hope Lelliott-Stevens

Want more top horror lists and reviews? Check out our blog here..

Categories
Reviews

Review – Scream VI

Only a year has passed since audiences have heard Ghostface say “what’s your favourite scary movie?”, yet for fellow Scream fans and keen slasher-seekers, the latest addition to the franchise has been a long time coming. But was the wait worth it? 

When it comes to the world of Scream, nearly everything has been said and done, and many fans have been apprehensive that the cycle is nearing its full circle. However, whilst spoilers narrow an all-revealing response, it can be assured that Tyler Gillett and Matt Bettinelli-Olpin deliver a hefty punch of nail-biting tension, with the thrill factor at an all-time high. 

Scream is intrinsically woven with Woodsboro, the seemingly cursed town. However, just as the early days in the franchise sent the Ghostface-fighting crew on a state crossing mission, Scream VI sets its eyes on the city sights as the latest string of victims takes to ‘The Big Apple’. The New York setting both ups the ante and adds a whole new level of existential nihilism to the mix, stripping the ease of containment away. In Woodsboro, Ghostface was confined; somewhat unable to tread fear into wider paradigms. With Bettinelli and Gillet spinning a modern flare on the antics, Ghostface is unbelievably stringent, violent, and more frenzied than ever. In fact, it would not be a far cry to say that Scream VI is the bloodiest film of them all, with every kill being utterly brutal and beyond capable of making every viewer wince. 

In its purest form, the world of Scream is a big whodunit mystery, a hardcore version of ‘Guess Who’, where we use the characters as pawns to root out the evil force within the group. And don’t forget the main rule of this cruel pastime – it’s always someone you know… Speaking of filmic traditions, Scream VI is literally plastered with horror easter eggs and nods to genre greats, with references to Psycho, The Babadook, Ready or Not, Giallo, Friday the 13th, The Ring, Argento, Peachfuzz, Carpenter, and of course all of the previous Ghostface killers. 

Want more top horror lists and reviews? Check out our blog here..

Categories
Reviews

Review- X (2022) – Ti West

x 2022 review


Wayne (Martin Henderson) is a hopeful producer who casts his younger girlfriend Maxine (Mia Goth), and fellow actress Bobby-Lynne (Brittany Snow) to star alongside former marine Jackson (Scott Mescudi) in Wayne’s upcoming “dirty movie”, The Farmer’s Daughter. Joining them is director RJ (Owen Campbell) and his girlfriend Lorraine (Jenna Ortega). The group head to a rural farm in Texas owned by the elderly couple Howard (Stephen Ure) and Pearl (Mia Goth), who are kept in the dark about what the crew is shooting. Although Howard and Pearl’s unwelcoming reception proves to be tense, events soon turn much more sinister…

Ti West’s long awaited return to the genre is a stinging melody of psychosexual dread, fleshy fearfulness and enough tension to make those with nerves of steel clench their jaws. The A24 produced film fuses together multi-dimensional acting and a flawless sound arrangement to harness a bold take on modern-retro cinema and the intertwined wiring between horror and venereal subtexts. 

DSC_4467.NEF

X thrives on a meta-commentative spectrum where West clearly pours out his devotion to the art of filmmaking itself. There’s the external level of self-referentiality via the characters being part of a production crew, going out to make a film in hopes of taking advantage of the upcoming home video market. Accompanying the obvious and very direct nods to the audience is the group’s discussion of elevating a niche genre movie to be a product of quality and the potential that independent cinema holds. Rather than just rely on overt dialogue to marry the borders between screen and reality and how the 1970s setting advanced a creative surge for exploitation across all media is the reintroduction of split screen, wide zooms, and swiping transitional cuts. These factors are reminiscent of seventies classics such as Black Christmas (1974) and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1994) and still maintain a level of rarity amongst modern cinema, making these small touches noticeable, yet vital in bringing the viewer back in time. 

The pastiche ode to a bygone culture makes the film the love letter to cinema that it is. West has long infused a certain level of passion into his films, with The House of the Devil (2009) and The Innkeepers (2011) lingering success being down to their unique portrayal of the nefarious horror that lurks amongst isolating souls and settings. Whilst the crystal clear loyalty to filmmaking is a crucial plot device, one of the more direct double-entendre strands is birthed from the film’s most ferocious element. 

Hardcore porn is treated with an air of respect in X. West adds in the quintessential argument of morals thanks to a tense conversation between the holier-than-thou Lorraine and the rest of the crew, but overall the art of erotica serves as more than a cheap trick to lure in movie-goers and appease to the cliche that horror is just gory smut. It’s not a secret that horror has a long history of being taboo. Whilst heavy genre cinema still gets its premieres and mainstream releases, expressing a passion for horror still raises a few eyebrows to this day. X amalgamates the stereotypical lowbrow elements of horror and sex to conjure an artful expression of lust for life, bloodshed, and downright grizzly violence. 

The weighty symbolism is both subliminal and full throttle mainly down to the absolutely riveting performances from every single cast member. Brittany Snow rips off that Pitch Perfect (2012) reputation to deliver a totally surprising parade, Scott Mescudi unveils his best performance yet, Jenna Ortega cemented her role as a future scream queen, Martin Henderson excels at the whole ‘everything is bigger in Texas’ vibe, Owen Campbell perfects the ‘awkward’ fish out of water role, and last but not least is Mia Goth in this career defining performance. X provides a stage to exhibit Goth’s immense talent and versatility as an actor. The entire aesthetic of Maxine is reminiscent of Linda Lovelace, another sex symbol from the decade. More significantly Maxine possesses this usually unattainable confidence that spares no prisoners and dares to be tested, fashioning a level of allure that makes the viewer both unsure and undoubtedly mesmerized by her assertiveness. 

Whilst mimicking sleazy skin flicks holds a majority share in X’s growth, the cinematography is far from amateur. The brooding shots sweeping over the rural setting, as well as the slow motion scenes flourish stunningly within the slowburn narrative that allocates time specifically for director of photography, Eliot Rockett, to flesh out an eerie atmosphere that purposefully subverts our gaze and amplifies our curiosity. One particular scene masterfully raises the tension level through a bold overhead shot of Maxine taking a dip into a seemingly vacant lake. However, amongst the stillness in the swampy frame is a scaly alligator lurking right next to the unknowing Maxine. Whilst this reveal isn’t a spoiler, it does shed light on how West continuously diverts our attention and misdirects where the presumed violence is going to come from. The segment is a straight cut lesson on how to build a potent scare with no dialogue and soap opera dramatics. 

Indeed, X has ample amounts of foreboding cinematography, bountiful performances, and unmissable set design, but one area that really rips into the visceral nature of the story is the hard hitting soundtrack. Audiences will definitely find themselves bopping along to well known tunes and the not so subtle “bow chicka wow wow” music that accompanies The Farmer’s Daughter scenes. Welding the score to the more grounded texture of X is the cover of ‘Oui Oui Marie’ by Chelsea Wolfe, whose rendition of the dainty cabaret-esque 1918 song saturates the film with a gritty, dusty tonal expression. It’s just another one of the countless ways West dovetails the film’s neo-grindhouse influences throughout every single vessel. 

X has already achieved a warm welcome from frequent horror watchers and hard to please critics. And it seems that the film’s legacy has only just reached the surface as West is already in the editing phases of ‘Pearl’, X’s prequel, which will follow Howard’s disheveled wife and how the cabin was occupied as a boarding house during the first war. As if this wasn’t already a surprise to fans, West has also revealed that he has begun writing the third film which will chronologically follow the events unfolding after X’s ending. Whilst this is pretty big news considering X was released less than weeks ago, the slasher sub-genre does adore adding a string of sequels. 

X truly is the full package! Whether it’s the narrative arcs descending into touchy allegories surrounding death, or if it’s the sheer gory pandemonium X has it all, making it not only one of West’s most impressive films to date but also an unmissable soon to be classic. 

Looking for more top horror lists and reviews? Check out our blog here..

Categories
Reviews

Scream (2022) – Review

scream5review

Dead Northern reviews the greatly anticipated fifth instalment in the slasher film series below.

There are SPOILERS AHEAD, you have been warned!


One fateful night Tara Carpenter (Jenny Ortega) is all alone at home texting her friend Amber (Mikey Madison), convincing her to come over. But all of a sudden the landline starts ringing, at first the slightly off-kilter banterfull conversation is innocent, that is until we hear that iconic low, scratchy octave ask Tara “would you like to play a game?”. And just like that Scream is BACK! 

In 2019 when filmmaking duo Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett announced that they would be taking the bull by the horns and brazenly tackling the fifth instalment in the Scream franchise, many fans were beyond thrilled that Ghostface would be continuing their rampage. The man, the myth, the legend Wes Craven who created the franchise sadly passed away in 2015, leaving behind an unbeatable legacy. Could Scream even continue without the helm of Craven? Well, let’s find out… 

After twenty-five years since a string of savage murders erupted in the small town of Woodsboro, a new villain takes on the identity of Ghostface, leaving a bloody trail amongst the unlucky residents. Scream’s next generation serves a purpose. They are all connected to previous characters, including Woodsboro’s own movie expert Randy Meeks (Jamie Kennedy), Sheriff Judie Hicks (Marley Shelton), and everyone’s favourite partners in crime, Stu Macher (Matthew Lillard) and Billy Loomis (Skeet Ulrich). 

The original Scream jostled with the postmodern boom that 1990s films thrived in. It’s this combination of self-referential treatment mingling with meta-cinema that facilitated the quick ironic humour that the franchise is known for. Across the previous films, every joke about sequels, franchises, fandoms, actors, and the Hollywood cycle has been done. Nothing else could possibly be added. Here’s where writers Guy Busick and James Vanderbilt regenerated the already embellished one-liners. Many of the filler characters have extensive movie knowledge, allowing for hysterical tirades about how devoted horror fans don’t want increasingly popular “requels” (reboot-sequel) to be a stand alone story with no continuing context- à la Black Christmas (2019); alternatively, franchise-enthusiasts want a connection to an original legacy. Just as Amber states “you can’t have a bonafide Halloween without Jamie Lee”. 

The film exchanges with the audience directly, transfusing the fourth wall with reality. These rants about movie rules are precisely aimed at the viewer, making quips about how obsessive diehard fans are to please. Almost digging at those who’d immediately shun this new entry before even giving it a chance. Of course, many chuckles were had at the numerous easter eggs and mention of the fictional in-house ‘Stab’ movies, but the film’s strength doesn’t derive from the humour which will eventually fade after a couple of watches, instead the cardinal prizewinner is the unyielding brutality of the kills. Throughout all five films, this one takes the lead as the most shockingly savage and graphic film to date. Casey Becker (Drew Barrymore) has one of the franchise’s gnarliest deaths. Whether or not she can continue to hold the top spot is now another issue. Ghostface slices and dices their way through bodies with ease, not holding a single ounce of remorse, nor does the camera shy away from the direct insertion of their gleaming hunting knife. 

As delightful as it was to see Sidney (Neve Campbell), Dewey (David Arquette), and Gale (Courteney Cox) step back into their stomping grounds, the film’s main protagonist Sam who was fantastically portrayed by the very talented Melissa Barrera was indeed a breath of fresh air. Her natural ability to be both vulnerable and fiercely strong allows her to stand beside the genre’s greatest final girls with ease. Joining Barrera is her on-screen boyfriend Richie Kirsch, played by Jack Quaid, who is the receiver of the film’s best jokes by far. Lurking alongside the stellar performances is the factor of unexpectedness. Not a single soul is safe. Scream isn’t the first and last franchise that sheds characters as and when needed, however Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillet truly don’t have a whiff of compassion at all for who gets to survive and who gets to die. The ever looming threat of death loiters over every character’s head, legacy or not…

Much praise has seen the light of day in regards to the film. Yet, there does seem to be a general critique floating around about the lack of scares. Horror is subjective, there’s no denying that. What works for one person will almost never work for the next, but within the last couple of decades, horror has evolved and changed. As controversial as it is, horror cinema does not have to make your blood run cold or have you quaking in your boots to be considered ‘good’ anymore. Scream raises the threat level and creates admirable tension, despite the fact that it didn’t have me terrified to turn the lights off. Although the 1996 original did give me the ‘heebie jeebies’, it wasn’t intended to be blood-curdling terrifying.

This instalment playfully mocks pestering film bro’s who mention the term that makes my eyes roll- “elevated horror’. When asked what her favourite scary movie is, Casey replies with John Carpenter’s infamous Halloween (1978), whereas Tara answers with The Babadook (2014), a fantastic film in its own right. But what comes next is Tara’s betrayal of the genre. She disavows typical horror as pure schlock and guts. Almost directly commenting on how elevated horrors wouldn’t stoop to the level that slashers do, opting instead for emotionally developed, politically enamoured narratives. 

It is with this boldness and knowingly critical lens that Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett shine. They know how to rinse inside genre jokes and make fun of their own attempt of recycling an already perfect classic. The Scream franchise has always managed to tiptoe between not taking itself too seriously, whilst still not becoming a total parody. Scream (22) captures this essence with ease, making it a solid and welcomed entry into horror’s most unique franchise.